Jelena Ostapenko vs Amanda Anisimova Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Recent Form Prediction Analysis:

1. Second Serve Performance: In the past six months, the second serve performance of Amanda Anisimova and Jelena Ostapenko has been noteworthy. Anisimova has displayed a commendable winning rate of 50.66% on her second serve, while Ostapenko has achieved a respectable 40.09% success rate. It is important to note that this statistical aspect has exhibited a strong correlation with match prediction accuracy.
2. Return Game Statistics: Analyzing the return game stats of these players in recent form provides valuable insights. Anisimova has demonstrated an impressive ability to win 59.15% of her opponent's second serve points, whereas Ostapenko has exhibited a slightly lower success rate of 58.21%. In terms of first serve returns, Anisimova's record stands at 37.68%, while Ostapenko's stands at 40.61%. These figures have a significant impact on determining the favored player in their head-to-head matchup.
3. Under Pressure Analysis: Examining how players perform under pressure can aid in making betting predictions. Anisimova has effectively saved 58.57% of breakpoints in recent matches, highlighting her resilience during crucial moments. Conversely, Ostapenko has managed to salvage 53.47% of breakpoints, further emphasizing the importance of this statistic in in-game betting predictions.
4. Performance Overview: Reviewing the overall performance of these players in the past year offers valuable insights. Anisimova has emerged victorious in 65.79% of matches played (25 wins, 13 losses), while Ostapenko has secured wins in 53.49% of her matches (23 wins, 20 losses). This comprehensive head-to-head prediction overview provides a comprehensive perspective on their current form and prowess.
5. Best Surface: Assessing the players' performance on different surfaces yields compelling data. Anisimova thrives on clay, boasting a career win percentage of 65% (48 wins, 26 losses) on this surface. In contrast, her performance on indoor hard courts is less impressive, with a win percentage of 50% (2 wins, 2 losses). Ostapenko's most successful surface is grass, with a win rate of 69% (53 wins, 24 losses). However, she struggles relatively more on hard courts, with a win percentage of 55% (143 wins, 115 losses).
6. Player Level: Evaluating the level of play at which these players have frequently competed in the past year offers valuable insights. Anisimova has predominantly participated in the prestigious Masters series, achieving an impressive 76.47% win rate (13 wins, 4 losses) in these high-profile events. In comparison, Ostapenko has primarily competed in the Masters series as well, garnering a commendable 66.67% win rate (14 wins, 7 losses). When evaluating the favorite player, it is crucial to consider the relative event level they have been participating in.

Head-to-Head Analysis: In their previous encounters, Anisimova and Ostapenko have faced each other once before, with Anisimova failing to secure victory while Ostapenko emerged triumphant. The two players have contested three sets in total, resulting in Anisimova winning one set and Ostapenko winning two. The most recent match between the two took place at the Qatar TotalEnergies Open - Doha on February 22, 2022, on a hard court. In this thrilling encounter, Jelena Ostapenko claimed a hard-fought victory with a scoreline of 6-3, 4-6, 6-4.

Head-to-Head Match Duration: The average match duration in their previous head-to-head battles has been recorded at 1 hour, 39 minutes, and 0 seconds.

Prediction for Deciding Set: Anisimova and Ostapenko have encountered a deciding set once, with Anisimova failing to emerge victorious while Ostapenko triumphed in that instance. This historical data becomes crucial in predicting the outcome should this upcoming match reach a deciding set.

Head-to-Head Extreme Pressure Situations: Anisimova and Ostapenko have never faced each other in tiebreak situations. Thus, no conclusions can be drawn regarding their performance under extreme pressure.

Opponent Quality Statistics: Over the past 12 months, Anisimova has competed against opponents with an average ranking of 127.95. On the other hand, Ostapenko has encountered players with an average rank of 115.81. These statistics shed light on the level of competition each player has faced, further enriching the prediction analysis.

Deciding Set Performance vs. All Players: Delving into their performance in deciding sets provides significant insights. Over the past year, Anisimova has emerged triumphant in 36% of her deciding set battles, while Ostapenko boasts a higher success rate of 58% in all matches played on the tour. These figures inform live predictions and betting decisions, particularly if the upcoming match extends to a deciding set.

Current Event Head-to-Head Statistics: While historical performance offers valuable indicators in predicting tennis matches, current event statistics are also crucial. Continuously monitoring player performance in the ongoing event provides a reliable gauge of their form. For the most up-to-date statistics, please refer to the relevant section below (available if the players have already participated in matches during the current event). It should be noted that certain players may exhibit superior performance at specific events, and this must be considered when making predictions.

Break Point Conversion: In terms of break point conversion, Anisimova has impressively converted 41.04% of her opportunities, while Ostapenko has showcased a slightly higher success rate of 46.92% when attempting to break her opponents' serve. This statistic becomes particularly relevant during in-game live betting, as it determines the probability of success when either player encounters a break point opportunity.

If you are intrigued by models that predict tennis matches, consider perusing this article (Warning: Stats enthusiasts only).